DIS Funding Rate — perpetuals across 2 venues

TradFi perpetual · compared across 2 venues · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutes

DIS is an equity-linked perpetual referencing DIS, traded on-chain (not a tokenized xStock). Perpia compares its annualized funding across venues and the best delta-neutral spread.

Live annualized DIS perpetual funding across all 2 venues Perpia tracks. Right now DIS funding is positive on 0 and negative on 1, ranging from +0.0% on Aster to -43.5% on KuCoin — a spread of 43.5%. The widest delta-neutral trade is long KuCoin / short Aster at 27.8% net APR.

2
venues
0
paying positive
43.5%
funding spread
Best DIS spread now
27.8%
net APR after fees
Long KuCoinShort Aster
size depends on live venue depth — see the real cap in the scanner

DIS funding trend & liquidity

167h of history
43.5%
current gross APR
1.2%
24h average
-6.4%
7-day average
$13K
pair OI · lower leg
$278K
24h volume · lower leg

Averages are historical funding over the window shown. A current rate near the 7-day average may indicate the spread has persisted; a rate far above it is usually a short-lived spike. OI and volume are the smaller (binding) leg of the best pair — the ceiling on tradeable size.

DIS funding rate by venue

1 pairs scanned
VenueFunding APRInterval
Aster+0.0%8h
KuCoin-43.5%8h

Rates annualized; updated ~every few minutes from live venue data.

Loading DIS backtest…

DIS funding — FAQ

Is DIS funding positive right now?

DIS perpetual funding is positive on 0 of 2 venues Perpia tracks and negative on 1. The highest is +0.0% on Aster; the lowest is -43.5% on KuCoin.

What is the best DIS funding arbitrage right now?

Go long KuCoin and short Aster for about 27.8% net APR after fees — the widest delta-neutral DIS spread Perpia currently sees.

Which exchange has the highest DIS funding rate?

Aster, at +0.0% annualized. Funding shifts continuously, so check the live table above before trading.

How DIS funding arbitrage works

Funding arbitrage combines opposing positions on two venues — long the one paying the most negative funding, short the one paying the most positive — to reduce directional exposure and capture the difference between their funding payments. Fees, slippage, basis divergence and liquidation risk can reduce the result. See the methodology for how it is measured and the guide for the full walkthrough.