PEP Funding Rate — perpetuals across 2 venues

TradFi perpetual · compared across 2 venues · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutes

PEP is an equity-linked perpetual referencing PEP, traded on-chain (not a tokenized xStock). Perpia compares its annualized funding across venues and the best delta-neutral spread.

Live annualized PEP perpetual funding across all 2 venues Perpia tracks. Right now PEP funding is positive on 1 and negative on 1, ranging from +10.9% on Gate.io to -235.7% on Bybit — a spread of 246.6%. The widest delta-neutral trade is long Bybit / short Gate.io at 241.2% net APR.

2
venues
1
paying positive
246.6%
funding spread
Best PEP spread now
241.2%
net APR after fees
Long BybitShort Gate.io
size depends on live venue depth — see the real cap in the scanner

PEP funding trend & liquidity

58h of history
246.6%
current gross APR
92.3%
24h average
62.7%
7-day average
$61K
pair OI · lower leg
$17K
24h volume · lower leg

Averages are historical funding over the window shown. A current rate near the 7-day average may indicate the spread has persisted; a rate far above it is usually a short-lived spike. OI and volume are the smaller (binding) leg of the best pair — the ceiling on tradeable size.

PEP funding rate by venue

1 pairs scanned
VenueFunding APRInterval
Gate.io+10.9%8h
Bybit-235.7%8h

Rates annualized; updated ~every few minutes from live venue data.

Loading PEP backtest…

PEP funding — FAQ

Is PEP funding positive right now?

PEP perpetual funding is positive on 1 of 2 venues Perpia tracks and negative on 1. The highest is +10.9% on Gate.io; the lowest is -235.7% on Bybit.

What is the best PEP funding arbitrage right now?

Go long Bybit and short Gate.io for about 241.2% net APR after fees — the widest delta-neutral PEP spread Perpia currently sees.

Which exchange has the highest PEP funding rate?

Gate.io, at +10.9% annualized. Funding shifts continuously, so check the live table above before trading.

How PEP funding arbitrage works

Funding arbitrage combines opposing positions on two venues — long the one paying the most negative funding, short the one paying the most positive — to reduce directional exposure and capture the difference between their funding payments. Fees, slippage, basis divergence and liquidation risk can reduce the result. See the methodology for how it is measured and the guide for the full walkthrough.