SLV Funding Rate — live across 2 venues
Compared across 2 supported venues · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutes
Live annualized SLV perpetual funding across all 2 venues Perpia tracks. Right now SLV funding is positive on 2 and negative on 0, ranging from +13.1% on Arcus to +5.0% on Vest — a spread of 8.1%. The widest delta-neutral trade is long Vest / short Arcus at 4.2% net APR.
SLV funding trend & liquidity
168h of historyAverages are historical funding over the window shown. A current rate near the 7-day average may indicate the spread has persisted; a rate far above it is usually a short-lived spike. OI and volume are the smaller (binding) leg of the best pair — the ceiling on tradeable size.
SLV funding rate by venue
1 pairs scannedRates annualized; updated ~every few minutes from live venue data. Venue names link to that exchange's full funding table; ↗ opens the market on the exchange itself. Every spread between these two venues is on the Vest vs Arcus page.
Loading SLV backtest…
SLV funding — FAQ
Is SLV funding positive right now?
SLV perpetual funding is positive on 2 of 2 venues Perpia tracks. The highest is +13.1% on Arcus; the lowest is +5.0% on Vest.
What is the best SLV funding arbitrage right now?
Go long Vest and short Arcus for about 4.2% net APR after fees — the widest delta-neutral SLV spread Perpia currently sees.
Which exchange has the highest SLV funding rate?
Arcus, at +13.1% annualized. Funding shifts continuously, so check the live table above before trading.
How SLV funding arbitrage works
Funding arbitrage combines opposing positions on two venues — long the one paying the most negative funding, short the one paying the most positive — to reduce directional exposure and capture the difference between their funding payments. Fees, slippage, basis divergence and liquidation risk can reduce the result. See the methodology for how it is measured and the guide for the full walkthrough.
Markets related to SLV
Markets with the widest spreads on Arcus — the same two exchanges you would already have funded for the SLV trade.