CAD Funding Rate — perpetuals across 2 venues

TradFi perpetual · compared across 2 venues · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutes

CAD is an equity-linked perpetual referencing CAD, traded on-chain (not a tokenized xStock). Perpia compares its annualized funding across venues and the best delta-neutral spread.

Live annualized CAD perpetual funding across all 2 venues Perpia tracks. Right now CAD funding is positive on 2 and negative on 0, ranging from +15.7% on MEXC to +2.5% on Ostium — a spread of 13.1%. The widest delta-neutral trade is long Ostium / short MEXC at 7.6% net APR.

2
venues
2
paying positive
13.1%
funding spread
Best CAD spread now
7.6%
net APR after fees
Long OstiumShort MEXC
size depends on live venue depth — see the real cap in the scanner

CAD funding trend & liquidity

168h of history
13.1%
current gross APR
-6.1%
24h average
-6.9%
7-day average
$1.0M
pair OI · lower leg
$154K
24h volume · lower leg

Averages are historical funding over the window shown. A current rate near the 7-day average may indicate the spread has persisted; a rate far above it is usually a short-lived spike. OI and volume are the smaller (binding) leg of the best pair — the ceiling on tradeable size.

CAD funding rate by venue

1 pairs scanned
VenueFunding APRInterval
MEXC+15.7%8h
Ostium+2.5%1h

Rates annualized; updated ~every few minutes from live venue data.

Loading CAD backtest…

CAD funding — FAQ

Is CAD funding positive right now?

CAD perpetual funding is positive on 2 of 2 venues Perpia tracks. The highest is +15.7% on MEXC; the lowest is +2.5% on Ostium.

What is the best CAD funding arbitrage right now?

Go long Ostium and short MEXC for about 7.6% net APR after fees — the widest delta-neutral CAD spread Perpia currently sees.

Which exchange has the highest CAD funding rate?

MEXC, at +15.7% annualized. Funding shifts continuously, so check the live table above before trading.

How CAD funding arbitrage works

Funding arbitrage combines opposing positions on two venues — long the one paying the most negative funding, short the one paying the most positive — to reduce directional exposure and capture the difference between their funding payments. Fees, slippage, basis divergence and liquidation risk can reduce the result. See the methodology for how it is measured and the guide for the full walkthrough.