GS Funding Rate — perpetuals across 2 venues

TradFi perpetual · compared across 2 venues · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutes

GS is an equity-linked perpetual referencing GS, traded on-chain (not a tokenized xStock). Perpia compares its annualized funding across venues and the best delta-neutral spread.

Live annualized GS perpetual funding across all 2 venues Perpia tracks. Right now GS funding is positive on 1 and negative on 0, ranging from +248.8% on Bybit to +0.0% on Bitget — a spread of 248.8%. The widest delta-neutral trade is long Bitget / short Bybit at 237.8% net APR.

2
venues
1
paying positive
248.8%
funding spread
Best GS spread now
237.8%
net APR after fees
Long BitgetShort Bybit
size depends on live venue depth — see the real cap in the scanner

GS funding trend & liquidity

248.8%
current gross APR
24h average
7-day average
$64K
pair OI · lower leg
$280K
24h volume · lower leg

Averages are historical funding over the window shown. A current rate near the 7-day average may indicate the spread has persisted; a rate far above it is usually a short-lived spike. OI and volume are the smaller (binding) leg of the best pair — the ceiling on tradeable size.

GS funding rate by venue

1 pairs scanned
VenueFunding APRInterval
Bybit+248.8%8h
Bitget+0.0%8h

Rates annualized; updated ~every few minutes from live venue data.

Loading GS backtest…

GS funding — FAQ

Is GS funding positive right now?

GS perpetual funding is positive on 1 of 2 venues Perpia tracks. The highest is +248.8% on Bybit; the lowest is +0.0% on Bitget.

What is the best GS funding arbitrage right now?

Go long Bitget and short Bybit for about 237.8% net APR after fees — the widest delta-neutral GS spread Perpia currently sees.

Which exchange has the highest GS funding rate?

Bybit, at +248.8% annualized. Funding shifts continuously, so check the live table above before trading.

How GS funding arbitrage works

Funding arbitrage combines opposing positions on two venues — long the one paying the most negative funding, short the one paying the most positive — to reduce directional exposure and capture the difference between their funding payments. Fees, slippage, basis divergence and liquidation risk can reduce the result. See the methodology for how it is measured and the guide for the full walkthrough.