Arcus vs Ostium Funding Arbitrage
20 shared markets · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutesArcus and Ostium both quote 20 of the same perpetual markets, so a delta-neutral position can be split across the two and collect the difference in their funding. The widest spread on a market with real depth is CRWV — long Ostium / short Arcus at 66.5% net APR — but the median across all shared markets is 22.4%, which is the number worth planning around.
The long leg is whichever venue prices funding lower for that market. It is a property of the MARKET, not of the exchange, and it flips as rates move: here 4 markets go long on Arcus and 16 on Ostium. 17 markets clear 5% net APR, 14 clear 10%.
How this pair behaves
Arcus pays funding every 1h on 63 markets; Ostium pays every 1h on 53 markets. Both sides settle on the same clock, so a position opened here collects or pays on both legs at once — the spread you see is the spread you get. Arcus quotes 63 perpetual markets in total and Ostium quotes 53; the 20 they share are what this page ranks. Across its own book Arcus runs a median funding rate of 10.9% and Ostium 0.0% — the two sit on opposite sides of zero, which is why this combination throws up spreads at all.
Spreads by market
top 20 of 20 by net APR| Market | Long | Short | Net APR | Gross | 7d avg | Thin leg vol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COIN | Ostium | Arcus | 72.6% | 79.5% | +12.9% | $766K |
| CRWV | Ostium | Arcus | 66.5% | 73.6% | +27.8% | $1.4M |
| HOOD | Ostium | Arcus | 66.2% | 73.2% | +10.0% | $3.3M |
| AMD | Ostium | Arcus | 54.1% | 60.9% | +21.9% | $5.6M |
| CRCL | Ostium | Arcus | 33.1% | 40.1% | +13.4% | $1.8M |
| BABA | Ostium | Arcus | 32.8% | 39.7% | +11.9% | $242K |
| MU | Ostium | Arcus | 30.9% | 37.6% | +11.2% | $3.4M |
| ORCL | Ostium | Arcus | 30.5% | 37.4% | +9.4% | $528K |
| NVDA | Arcus | Ostium | 28.5% | 35.3% | -1.4% | $26.3M |
| MRNA | Arcus | Ostium | 23.0% | 29.9% | +4.3% | $3.6M |
| SPCX | Ostium | Arcus | 21.8% | 28.7% | +14.6% | $3.0M |
| META | Ostium | Arcus | 16.4% | 23.2% | +9.1% | $3.3M |
| MSFT | Arcus | Ostium | 11.0% | 17.8% | +4.4% | $1.4M |
| PLTR | Arcus | Ostium | 10.6% | 17.5% | -3.2% | $476K |
| MRVL | Ostium | Arcus | 9.2% | 16.1% | +14.4% | $392K |
| BTC | Ostium | Arcus | 5.2% | 10.9% | +7.0% | $35.6M |
| ETH | Ostium | Arcus | 5.1% | 10.9% | +9.4% | $10.2M |
| HYPE | Ostium | Arcus | 4.7% | 10.9% | +10.5% | $2.8M |
| SOL | Ostium | Arcus | 4.6% | 10.9% | +6.4% | $3.7M |
| AMZN | Ostium | Arcus | 3.7% | 10.5% | -1.7% | $1.0M |
Net APR subtracts entry and exit fees, both legs' bid/ask spread and estimated slippage from the gross funding spread. The 7-day average is historical gross funding for the same pair: a current rate close to it suggests the spread has persisted, one far above it is usually a spike that will decay.
Arcus vs Ostium — FAQ
How many markets can you arbitrage between Arcus and Ostium?
20 perpetual markets are quoted on both Arcus and Ostium right now. 17 of them show a net spread of at least 5% APR after estimated fees, and 15 have at least $1M of 24h volume on the smaller leg.
What is the best Arcus / Ostium funding spread right now?
CRWV: long Ostium and short Arcus for about 66.5% net APR after estimated fees, counting only markets with at least $1M of 24h volume on the smaller leg. The median across all 20 shared markets is 22.4%, so the top of the list is not typical.
Which side pays on the Arcus / Ostium pair?
It varies by market: Arcus is the long (funding-receiving) leg in 4 of the shared markets and Ostium in the other 16. The direction is set per market by which venue currently prices funding lower.
Trading the Arcus / Ostium spread
The trade is one position split across two venues: long the exchange paying the more negative funding, short the one paying the more positive, in the same size. What limits it is not the headline APR but the smaller leg's liquidity, the fees on both sides, and how long the spread survives — funding decays and flips, often within hours. Venue detail: Arcus funding rates · Ostium funding rates; the full calculation is in the methodology.