BingX vs Nado Funding Arbitrage
17 shared markets · net of estimated fees · updated every few minutesBingX and Nado both quote 17 of the same perpetual markets, so a delta-neutral position can be split across the two and collect the difference in their funding. The widest spread on a market with real depth is ZEC — long BingX / short Nado at 19.1% net APR — but the median across all shared markets is 12.7%, which is the number worth planning around.
The long leg is whichever venue prices funding lower for that market. It is a property of the MARKET, not of the exchange, and it flips as rates move: here 3 markets go long on BingX and 14 on Nado. 14 markets clear 5% net APR, 10 clear 10%.
How this pair behaves
BingX pays funding every 4h on 251 markets and every 8h on 79 markets; Nado pays every 24h on 71 markets. The two clocks differ, so one leg settles while the other is still accruing: a position held for only a few hours can pay one side without ever collecting from the other. BingX quotes 332 perpetual markets in total and Nado quotes 71; the 17 they share are what this page ranks. Across its own book BingX runs a median funding rate of 10.9% and Nado -1.8% — the two sit on opposite sides of zero, which is why this combination throws up spreads at all.
Spreads by market
top 17 of 17 by net APR| Market | Long | Short | Net APR | Gross | 7d avg | Thin leg vol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONS | Nado | BingX | 54.7% | 57.4% | +44.9% | $191K |
| CHIP | Nado | BingX | 37.5% | 40.1% | +18.4% | $86K |
| LTC | Nado | BingX | 20.2% | 22.6% | +7.4% | $104K |
| PENGU | Nado | BingX | 19.7% | 22.3% | +18.4% | $99K |
| ZEC | BingX | Nado | 19.1% | 21.2% | +0.2% | $12.8M |
| MEGA | Nado | BingX | 18.2% | 21.4% | +23.3% | $58K |
| UNI | Nado | BingX | 15.6% | 17.9% | +12.1% | $771K |
| BNB | Nado | BingX | 13.0% | 15.1% | +8.4% | $4.1M |
| LINK | Nado | BingX | 12.7% | 15.0% | +26.4% | $46K |
| ONDO | Nado | BingX | 11.5% | 14.0% | +8.9% | $410K |
| SKY | Nado | BingX | 9.0% | 11.4% | +34.6% | $73K |
| AVAX | Nado | BingX | 8.7% | 11.2% | +17.0% | $68K |
| WLD | Nado | BingX | 8.0% | 10.4% | +19.0% | $495K |
| SOL | Nado | BingX | 6.7% | 9.0% | +3.7% | $36.2M |
| BCH | Nado | BingX | 3.2% | 5.5% | +5.3% | $132K |
| AAVE | BingX | Nado | 1.4% | 3.6% | -4.6% | $151K |
| BTC | BingX | Nado | 0.8% | 2.9% | -1.0% | $171.0M |
Net APR subtracts entry and exit fees, both legs' bid/ask spread and estimated slippage from the gross funding spread. The 7-day average is historical gross funding for the same pair: a current rate close to it suggests the spread has persisted, one far above it is usually a spike that will decay.
Coverage note: BingX and Nado share 17 markets, 4 of them with real depth — below the 10 markets / 5 liquid this page treats as full coverage, so this is a thin sample rather than a picture of the pair.
BingX vs Nado — FAQ
How many markets can you arbitrage between BingX and Nado?
17 perpetual markets are quoted on both BingX and Nado right now. 14 of them show a net spread of at least 5% APR after estimated fees, and 4 have at least $1M of 24h volume on the smaller leg.
What is the best BingX / Nado funding spread right now?
ZEC: long BingX and short Nado for about 19.1% net APR after estimated fees, counting only markets with at least $1M of 24h volume on the smaller leg. The median across all 17 shared markets is 12.7%, so the top of the list is not typical.
Which side pays on the BingX / Nado pair?
It varies by market: BingX is the long (funding-receiving) leg in 3 of the shared markets and Nado in the other 14. The direction is set per market by which venue currently prices funding lower.
Trading the BingX / Nado spread
The trade is one position split across two venues: long the exchange paying the more negative funding, short the one paying the more positive, in the same size. What limits it is not the headline APR but the smaller leg's liquidity, the fees on both sides, and how long the spread survives — funding decays and flips, often within hours. Venue detail: BingX funding rates · Nado funding rates; the full calculation is in the methodology.